Skip to content

Check a live buyer request

Free automated Fit Check before payment. Confirm the current request, deadline, source-record readiness, and how many separate buyer reviews you expect to handle in the next 30 days.

What this checks

  • The current request is an active external buyer review due within 30 calendar days.
  • You have enough buyer-shareable records for useful source-linked output.
  • The request does not ask for an audit, certification, legal opinion, penetration test, system access, or buyer-approval guarantee.
  • Your active-review count is used only to recommend honest package capacity—not to change evidence strictness or sell fictional processing priority.

The current request must be due within 30 calendar days.

Each review remains separate and must pass its own automated Fit Check before generation. This answer recommends capacity; it does not loosen scope.

Which records can you provide?

Select every category you can upload after purchase. You do not need every category. Clean in-scope requests can pass with a buyer request and two or more strong source-record categories.

Upload the actual buyer questionnaire, RFP, spreadsheet, or portal export if available. Do not upload secrets, credentials, source code, health data, or payment-card data.

Optional commercial context

These answers improve capacity recommendations and billing support. They never change evidence strictness, create unsupported claims, or change price based on deal value.

Direct checkout without an approved Fit Check token is blocked so customers do not buy the wrong scope.

Anonymized scenario summaries

Common buyer-review scenarios

Common patterns where a team needs to turn buyer-review records into a source-linked, reviewer-ready package. No company, buyer, deal, or customer is named.

Scenario 01

Security questionnaire due soon

A software supplier has a live enterprise security questionnaire and needs to turn scattered security and privacy records into a reviewable response package.

Records typically available
  • Buyer questionnaire or RFP file
  • SOC 2 or ISO record
  • Security overview
  • Access control or MFA policy
  • Incident response or subprocessor record

Boundary: AttestLayer packages record-supported output. Your team reviews what to send.

Scenario 02

AI or automation review

A vendor is asked to explain approval controls, human review, escalation, data handling, and limits on automated actions before a buyer can approve the tool.

Records typically available
  • AI governance policy
  • Architecture or data-flow overview
  • Approval-control record
  • Privacy or DPA record
  • Authorized owner can confirm facts

Boundary: AttestLayer organizes the supplied records into a reviewable buyer-response package.

Scenario 03

Partner review blocking launch

A supplier is preparing for a platform, channel, or marketplace review and needs a clear package covering security, privacy, vendor-risk, and operational evidence.

Records typically available
  • Partner review request
  • Privacy notice and DPA
  • Access control record
  • Business continuity material
  • Security or architecture summary

Boundary: AttestLayer creates the package; the customer decides what to share with the partner.